Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMCPX
FSMDX vs TMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMCPX
FSMDX vs TMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMCPX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. TMCPX (5.44B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMCPX: FSMDX (1.14) vs TMCPX (0.29). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMCPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TMCPX (22 years). TMCPX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCPX: FSMDX (0) vs TMCPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. TMCPX (3.45). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. TMCPX (56.62).
| FSMDX | TMCPX | FSMDX / TMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | -0.507 | -631% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 5.44B | 742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.29 | 394% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 3.45 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 30.53 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 56.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 120.87 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement