Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMCPX
FSMDX vs TMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMCPX
FSMDX vs TMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMCPX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. TMCPX (4.49B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMCPX: FSMDX (0.76) vs TMCPX (0.24). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMCPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TMCPX (24 years). TMCPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. TMCPX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCPX: FSMDX (0) vs TMCPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.14 vs. TMCPX (4.39). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. TMCPX (23.14).
| FSMDX | TMCPX | FSMDX / TMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.326 | 4.270 | 359% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 4.49B | 1,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.24 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.14 | 4.39 | 459% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.87 | 23.48 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.77 | 23.14 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.44 | 139.54 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers