Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMSIX
FSMDX vs TMSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMSIX
FSMDX vs TMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMSIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. TMSIX (3.14B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMSIX: FSMDX (0.76) vs TMSIX (0.36). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMSIX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TMSIX (29 years). TMSIX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TMSIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. TMSIX (11.73). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. TMSIX (5.24).
| FSMDX | TMSIX | FSMDX / TMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 19.538 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 3.14B | 1,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.36 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 11.73 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 26.21 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 5.24 | 900% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 74.15 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement