Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$23.70
Change+$0.19 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.5M
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. TQSAX (760M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs TQSAX (0.35). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSAX (9 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. TQSAX (1.33). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. TQSAX (62.79).
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | 3.935 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 760M | 5,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.35 | 370% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 1.33 | 1,141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.45 | 28.48 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.40 | 62.79 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement