Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$20.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.43M
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TQSAX (650M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (1.20) vs TQSAX (0.38). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSAX (9 years). TQSAX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.26 vs. TQSAX (-4.11). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 80.78 vs. TQSAX (67.65).
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.301 | -7.692 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 650M | 5,785% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.38 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | -4.11 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.18 | 10.91 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.78 | 67.65 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...