Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$22.67
Change+$0.25 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets705.53M
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. TQSAX (706M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (1.14) vs TQSAX (0.37). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSAX (9 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. TQSAX (0.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.65 vs. TQSAX (50.88).
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.599 | -0.884 | -181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 706M | 5,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.37 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 0.52 | 2,006% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 14.61 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.65 | 50.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement