Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. TQSAX (2.02B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs TQSAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSAX (10 years). TQSAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). TQSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.12 vs. FSMDX (22.60). TQSAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.53 vs. FSMDX (43.56).
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.43 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 17.782 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 2.02B | 2,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 32.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 60.01 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 49.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 180.75 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers