Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. TQSAX (2.06B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs TQSAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSAX (11 years). TQSAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). TQSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.27 vs. FSMDX (13.26). TQSAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. FSMDX (40.31).
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.43 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 15.446 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 2.06B | 2,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 16.27 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 51.55 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 43.90 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 159.67 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers