Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.25
Change-$0.33 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$24.04
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.32M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. TQSIX (792M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.29) vs TQSIX (0.68). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (9 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. TQSIX (7.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 68.07 vs. TQSIX (61.77).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | 7.004 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 792M | 5,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.68 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.49 | 7.86 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.64 | 23.06 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.07 | 61.77 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement