Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.85
Change-$0.21 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$23.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets757.19M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. TQSIX (757M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.31) vs TQSIX (0.69). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (9 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. TQSIX (2.62). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.76 vs. TQSIX (64.23).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.040 | 4.053 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 757M | 5,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.69 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.10 | 2.62 | 500% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.32 | 29.85 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.76 | 64.23 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement