Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$33.64
Change-$0.12 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.69B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$22.04
Change-$0.09 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets695.25M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.7B vs. TQSIX (695M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.21) vs TQSIX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (9 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. TQSIX (-2.33). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.84 vs. TQSIX (68.14).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.118 | -2.203 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 695M | 5,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.75 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | -2.33 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.52 | 22.11 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.84 | 68.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers