Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$24.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.66M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. TQSIX (848M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.26) vs TQSIX (0.65). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. TQSIX (8.44). FSMDX (71.01) and TQSIX (70.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | 10.000 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 848M | 5,283% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.65 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | 8.44 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 39.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 70.84 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement