Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. TQSIX (2.02B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (0.99) vs TQSIX (0.52). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). TQSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.74 vs. FSMDX (22.60). TQSIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. FSMDX (43.56).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.69 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 18.056 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 2.02B | 2,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.52 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 32.74 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 62.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 53.14 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 192.29 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers