Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. TQSIX (1.92B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (0.76) vs TQSIX (0.49). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). TQSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.70 vs. FSMDX (16.48). TQSIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.94 vs. FSMDX (42.85).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.69 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.189 | 18.017 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.92B | 2,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.49 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.48 | 25.70 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.88 | 51.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 52.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.40 | 173.83 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers