Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. TQSIX (2.05B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (0.75) vs TQSIX (0.50). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSIX (11 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). TQSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.50 vs. FSMDX (13.80). TQSIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.11 vs. FSMDX (41.16).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.69 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.485 | 14.816 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 2.05B | 2,588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.80 | 16.50 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.38 | 57.40 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.16 | 46.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.91 | 161.17 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers