Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$24.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.81M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. TQSMX (848M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.26) vs TQSMX (0.52). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.83 vs. TQSMX (6.54). FSMDX (70.60) and TQSMX (68.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 9.814 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 848M | 5,283% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.52 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 6.54 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.31 | 39.06 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.60 | 68.66 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement