Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.98
Change+$0.62 (+1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$20.89
Change+$0.44 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.2M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TQSMX (636M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.20) vs TQSMX (0.60). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. TQSMX (-6.38). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 77.28 vs. TQSMX (65.96).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.137 | -9.593 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 636M | 5,912% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.60 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | -6.38 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 6.45 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.28 | 65.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...