Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$34.35
Change-$0.77 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.63B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$22.90
Change-$0.58 (-2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets813.22M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 38.6B vs. TQSMX (813M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.28) vs TQSMX (0.48). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (13 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.10 vs. FSMDX (9.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. TQSMX (7.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 51.19 vs. TQSMX (41.78).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.717 | 1.238 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.6B | 813M | 4,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.48 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 7.23 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.51 | 18.59 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.19 | 41.78 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.43 | N/A | - |