Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.34
Change-$1.81 (-5.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$20.40
Change-$1.41 (-6.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.94M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TQSMX (658M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.20) vs TQSMX (0.60). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. TQSMX (-3.36). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 118.86 vs. TQSMX (103.97).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.836 | -3.581 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 658M | 5,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.60 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | -3.36 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.46 | 9.70 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.86 | 103.97 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...