Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$24.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.92M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. TQSMX (926M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.25) vs TQSMX (0.51). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. TQSMX (1.15). FSMDX (60.77) and TQSMX (60.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.969 | 9.240 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 926M | 4,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.51 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 1.15 | 564% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.66 | 39.72 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.77 | 60.50 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement