Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.81
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.81M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. TQSMX (784M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.29) vs TQSMX (0.55). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. TQSMX (4.51). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.55 vs. TQSMX (58.50).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.604 | 5.747 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 784M | 5,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.55 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.79 | 4.51 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.08 | 20.73 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.55 | 58.50 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement