Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.65
Change+$0.16 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.53M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. TQSMX (751M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.31) vs TQSMX (0.55). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. TQSMX (6.38). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 77.61 vs. TQSMX (69.91).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.149 | 3.846 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 751M | 5,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.55 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | 6.38 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.53 | 35.08 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.61 | 69.91 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement