Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.95
Change+$0.36 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.61
Change+$0.29 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751.04M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. TQSMX (751M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.31) vs TQSMX (0.55). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (9 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. TQSMX (-0.15). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.04 vs. TQSMX (63.57).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.645 | 3.095 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 751M | 5,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.55 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | -0.15 | -6,721% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.07 | 33.57 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.04 | 63.57 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement