Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. TQSMX (1.91B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (0.76) vs TQSMX (0.34). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). TQSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.00 vs. FSMDX (19.67). TQSMX return over 5 years is better than : 53.67 vs. FSMDX (45.89).
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 18.636 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.91B | 2,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.34 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 28.00 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 53.55 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 53.67 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 172.11 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers