Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs UMBMX
FSMDX vs UMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs UMBMX
FSMDX vs UMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. UMBMX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and UMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. UMBMX (4.26B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than UMBMX: FSMDX (0.76) vs UMBMX (0.43). FSMDX was incepted earlier than UMBMX: FSMDX (15 years) vs UMBMX (20 years). UMBMX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). UMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMBMX: FSMDX (0) vs UMBMX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. UMBMX (13.01). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. UMBMX (8.26).
| FSMDX | UMBMX | FSMDX / UMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 15.802 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 4.26B | 1,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.43 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 13.01 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 41.20 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 8.26 | 571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 84.87 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement