Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs VNVAX
FSMDX vs VNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs VNVAX
FSMDX vs VNVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. VNVAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and VNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. VNVAX (229M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than VNVAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs VNVAX (0.07). FSMDX was incepted earlier than VNVAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs VNVAX (18 years). VNVAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). VNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 163.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VNVAX: FSMDX (0) vs VNVAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.01 vs. VNVAX (-5.69). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.57 vs. VNVAX (-14.62).
| FSMDX | VNVAX | FSMDX / VNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.350 | 17.942 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 229M | 22,489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.07 | 1,328% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.01 | -5.69 | -387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.69 | 7.68 | 738% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.57 | -14.62 | -291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.37 | 14.34 | 1,216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers