Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs VNVAX
FSMDX vs VNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs VNVAX
FSMDX vs VNVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. VNVAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and VNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. VNVAX (225M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than VNVAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs VNVAX (0.08). FSMDX was incepted earlier than VNVAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs VNVAX (18 years). VNVAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). VNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 163.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VNVAX: FSMDX (0) vs VNVAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. VNVAX (-16.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. VNVAX (-18.57).
| FSMDX | VNVAX | FSMDX / VNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.10 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.622 | 10.854 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 225M | 23,156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.08 | 1,008% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | -16.96 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | -2.13 | -2,348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -18.57 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.64 | 4.73 | 3,503% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers