Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$24.33
Change+$0.29 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.17M
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. WAMFX (176M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs WAMFX (0.50). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. WAMFX (6.50). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.01 vs. WAMFX (39.34).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | 5.967 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 176M | 25,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.50 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | 6.50 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 22.83 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 39.34 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | 74.83 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers