Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$24.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.51M
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. WAMFX (175M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (1.31) vs WAMFX (0.52). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. WAMFX (7.18). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. WAMFX (41.44).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | 4.791 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 175M | 24,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.52 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 7.18 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.45 | 20.75 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.40 | 41.44 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.19 | 66.42 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement