Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.86
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$23.37
Change-$0.08 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.18M
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. WAMFX (170M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs WAMFX (0.51). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.88 vs. WAMFX (-2.17). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.61 vs. WAMFX (23.65).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.595 | 2.134 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 170M | 26,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.51 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | -2.17 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.96 | 12.30 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.61 | 23.65 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.06 | 63.05 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement