Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. WAMFX (163M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (0.76) vs WAMFX (0.54). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (15 years) vs WAMFX (15 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.06 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. WAMFX (4.82). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. WAMFX (12.46).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 11.220 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 163M | 31,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.54 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 4.82 | 447% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 21.53 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 12.46 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 70.24 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement