Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. WAMFX (152M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (0.99) vs WAMFX (0.58). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (15 years) vs WAMFX (15 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.06 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. WAMFX (1.82). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. WAMFX (8.01).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 2.404 | 559% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 152M | 33,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.58 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 1.82 | 1,261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 14.58 | 411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | 8.01 | 548% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 67.02 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers