Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMLX vs WCMLX
FSMLX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMLX vs WCMLX
FSMLX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMLX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMLX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMLX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FSMLX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSMLX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSMLX (13 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSMLX (0.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSMLX (48.01). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMLX: WCMLX (100000) vs FSMLX (1000000). FSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. FSMLX (-9.57).
| FSMLX | WCMLX | FSMLX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.246 | 3.852 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 47.2M | 4,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 2.81 | 322% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.79 | 23.40 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.57 | -7.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement