Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMLX vs WCMNX
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMLX vs WCMNX
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMLX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMLX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMLX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. WCMNX (51.9M). FSMLX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSMLX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSMLX (13 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSMLX (0.66). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSMLX (48.01). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMLX: WCMNX (1000) vs FSMLX (1000000). FSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.11 vs. WCMNX (16.65). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. FSMLX (-0.37).
| FSMLX | WCMNX | FSMLX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.24 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.04 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.150 | 11.144 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 51.9M | 4,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.11 | 16.65 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.05 | 31.41 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.37 | 1.76 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers