Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMRX vs PEMGX
FSMRX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMRX vs PEMGX
FSMRX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMRX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMRX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. FSMRX (3.36B). FSMRX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSMRX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FSMRX (35 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FSMRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.96 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FSMRX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.99 vs. PEMGX (-18.39). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -8.19 vs. FSMRX (-32.99).
| FSMRX | PEMGX | FSMRX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.90 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.90 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.412 | -7.292 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 21.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | -18.39 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.21 | 10.28 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.99 | -8.19 | 403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.86 | 73.29 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement