Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMTX vs PDBAX
FSMTX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMTX vs PDBAX
FSMTX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMTX vs. PDBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMTX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 53.5B vs. FSMTX (22.3B). FSMTX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: FSMTX (4.56) vs PDBAX (4.29). FSMTX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: FSMTX (8 years) vs PDBAX (31 years). PDBAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMTX (0.29). FSMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. PDBAX (91.00). FSMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDBAX: FSMTX (0) vs PDBAX (1000). PDBAX (5.95) and FSMTX (5.81) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.05 vs. PDBAX (0.85).
| FSMTX | PDBAX | FSMTX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.75 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.579 | 0.522 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 53.5B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.29 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.81 | 5.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.36 | 16.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.05 | 0.85 | 593% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement