Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMTX vs PDBZX
FSMTX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMTX vs PDBZX
Fidelity SAI Total Bond
Price$9.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.99B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.16B
FSMTX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMTX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMTX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49.2B vs. FSMTX (21B). FSMTX (4.61) and PDBZX (4.60) have matching dividends . FSMTX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FSMTX (7 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FSMTX (0.29). FSMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FSMTX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. PDBZX (5.91). FSMTX return over 5 years is better than : 0.03 vs. PDBZX (-1.02).
| FSMTX | PDBZX | FSMTX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.49 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.50 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.853 | 3.640 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21B | 49.2B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.61 | 4.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 5.91 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.75 | 10.00 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.03 | -1.02 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers