Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMTX vs PDBZX
FSMTX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMTX vs PDBZX
FSMTX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMTX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMTX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 53.5B vs. FSMTX (22.3B). FSMTX (4.56) and PDBZX (4.56) have matching dividends . FSMTX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FSMTX (8 years) vs PDBZX (30 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FSMTX (0.29). FSMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. PDBZX (91.00). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. FSMTX (5.81). FSMTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.05 vs. PDBZX (2.22).
| FSMTX | PDBZX | FSMTX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.49 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.50 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.579 | 0.710 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 53.5B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.81 | 6.23 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.36 | 16.95 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.05 | 2.22 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement