Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.53
Change-$0.10 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FSNIX (4.81B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.08). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.75 vs. RLBAX (8.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. FSNIX (32.20).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.170 | 13.298 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.08 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 8.15 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.67 | 38.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.20 | 34.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.31 | 63.50 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement