Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$16.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FSNIX (4.44B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.96) vs RLBAX (1.18). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. RLBAX (6.23). FSNIX (36.18) and RLBAX (34.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.682 | 7.710 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.18 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.58 | 6.23 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.49 | 33.46 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.18 | 34.69 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.02 | 55.43 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement