Ad is loading...
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$15.03
Change+$0.70 (+4.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.15
Change+$1.61 (+5.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.54B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 229B vs. FSNIX (4.21B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (2.12) vs RLBAX (1.27). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSNIX (21.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.06 vs. RLBAX (-4.32). FSNIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. RLBAX (26.13).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.33 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.33 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.489 | -7.147 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 229B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.27 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.06 | -4.32 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.12 | 3.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.85 | 26.13 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.47 | 34.16 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...