Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.45B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.34
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. FSNIX (4.45B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.95) vs RLBAX (1.17). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. RLBAX (7.23). FSNIX (33.69) and RLBAX (33.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.717 | 10.068 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.17 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.64 | 7.23 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.92 | 32.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.69 | 33.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.43 | 66.60 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement