Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$16.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.3B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FSNIX (4.3B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (2.04) vs RLBAX (1.23). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.26 vs. RLBAX (6.12). FSNIX return over 5 years is better than : 34.97 vs. RLBAX (30.42).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.648 | 4.247 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.3B | 244B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | 6.12 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 20.80 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | 30.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.42 | 52.56 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement