Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FSNIX (4.68B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.86) vs RLBAX (1.10). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. RLBAX (9.12). FSNIX (38.59) and RLBAX (38.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.525 | 13.770 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 9.12 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.02 | 47.98 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.59 | 38.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.82 | 68.72 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement