Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSNIX (5.61B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.78) vs RLBAX (1.14). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. RLBAX (15.80). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. FSNIX (29.94).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.32 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.428 | 8.988 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.14 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.46 | 15.80 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.26 | 41.07 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 31.83 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.97 | 80.24 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement