Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSNIX (5.7B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.76) vs RLBAX (1.12). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. RLBAX (5.83). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. FSNIX (25.78).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.32 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.842 | 7.935 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.7B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.12 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 5.83 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.89 | 38.21 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.78 | 27.39 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.85 | 75.00 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement