Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSNIX (5.6B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.79) vs RLBAX (1.13). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. RLBAX (10.43). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. FSNIX (26.30).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.32 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.022 | 7.908 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.13 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.12 | 10.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 35.45 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 28.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.60 | 73.40 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers