Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSNIX (5.6B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.79) vs RLBAX (1.13). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. RLBAX (11.72). RLBAX (29.85) and FSNIX (28.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.32 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.721 | 9.555 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 283B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.13 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 11.72 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.99 | 41.70 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.51 | 29.85 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.98 | 73.93 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement