Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs LMRIX
FSPCX vs LMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs LMRIX
FSPCX vs LMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. LMRIX commentary
Aug 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and LMRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 635M vs. LMRIX (100M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than LMRIX: FSPCX (1.69) vs LMRIX (0.25). FSPCX was incepted earlier than LMRIX: FSPCX (41 years) vs LMRIX (18 years). LMRIX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. LMRIX (9.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRIX: FSPCX (0) vs LMRIX (1000000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. LMRIX (-2.58). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.17 vs. LMRIX (-11.24).
| FSPCX | LMRIX | FSPCX / LMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.23 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.23 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.609 | 7.263 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 635M | 100M | 635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.25 | 687% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.21 | -2.58 | -395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 9.02 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.17 | -11.24 | -500% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.20 | 52.94 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement