Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs LMRIX
FSPCX vs LMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs LMRIX
FSPCX vs LMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. LMRIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and LMRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. LMRIX (91.7M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than LMRIX: FSPCX (1.96) vs LMRIX (0.27). FSPCX was incepted earlier than LMRIX: FSPCX (40 years) vs LMRIX (18 years). LMRIX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. LMRIX (9.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRIX: FSPCX (0) vs LMRIX (1000000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.33 vs. LMRIX (-14.66). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.20 vs. LMRIX (-24.73).
| FSPCX | LMRIX | FSPCX / LMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.23 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.23 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.579 | -6.034 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 575M | 91.7M | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.27 | 724% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.33 | -14.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | 5.16 | 463% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.20 | -24.73 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.98 | 35.26 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement