Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs PGFMX
FSPCX vs PGFMX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs PGFMX
FSPCX vs PGFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. PGFMX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and PGFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. PGFMX (5.9M). PGFMX pays higher dividends than FSPCX: PGFMX (3.34) vs FSPCX (1.70). FSPCX was incepted earlier than PGFMX: FSPCX (41 years) vs PGFMX (2 years). PGFMX (3.39) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PGFMX (15.00). FSPCX (0) and PGFMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PGFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. FSPCX (4.87).
| FSPCX | PGFMX | FSPCX / PGFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 3.39 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.872 | 8.517 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 5.9M | 10,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 3.34 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.87 | 9.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.80 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.19 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.97 | 16.09 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement