Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFAX
FSPCX vs RYFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFAX
FSPCX vs RYFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFAX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and RYFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. RYFAX (11.9M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFAX: FSPCX (1.80) vs RYFAX (1.43). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFAX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFAX (28 years). RYFAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFAX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFAX (2500). RYFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.86 vs. FSPCX (-0.78). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.33 vs. RYFAX (10.20).
| FSPCX | RYFAX | FSPCX / RYFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.70 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.168 | 0.955 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 11.9M | 5,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.78 | 3.86 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.15 | 55.86 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.33 | 10.20 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.54 | 95.91 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement