Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFCX
FSPCX vs RYFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFCX
FSPCX vs RYFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFCX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and RYFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. RYFCX (20.8M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFCX: FSPCX (1.70) vs RYFCX (1.61). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFCX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFCX (25 years). RYFCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFCX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFCX (2500). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. RYFCX (0.75). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. RYFCX (1.70).
| FSPCX | RYFCX | FSPCX / RYFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.48 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.738 | 2.015 | 285% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 20.8M | 3,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.88 | 0.75 | 653% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.93 | 52.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.69 | 1.70 | 2,808% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.95 | 70.15 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers