Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs SBFAX
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs SBFAX
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$90.63
Change-$0.17 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.87M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$29.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.18M
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 754M vs. SBFAX (110M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FSPCX (1.07) vs SBFAX (0.66). FSPCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FSPCX (40 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FSPCX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.44 vs. SBFAX (-14.19). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.38 vs. SBFAX (12.89).
| FSPCX | SBFAX | FSPCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.573 | 1.069 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 754M | 110M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.66 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | -14.19 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.39 | -0.30 | -8,123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.38 | 12.89 | 476% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.73 | 42.26 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement