Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs SBFAX
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs SBFAX
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. SBFAX (95.6M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FSPCX (1.70) vs SBFAX (0.07). FSPCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FSPCX (41 years) vs SBFAX (28 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. SBFAX (9.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FSPCX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.30 vs. SBFAX (-9.74). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. SBFAX (-12.92).
| FSPCX | SBFAX | FSPCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.284 | 4.349 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 95.6M | 654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.07 | 2,530% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | -9.74 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.11 | 9.91 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.76 | -12.92 | -370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.97 | 43.44 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers