Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs SFSLX
FSPCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs SFSLX
FSPCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. SFSLX (91.7M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FSPCX (1.96) vs SFSLX (0.00). FSPCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FSPCX (40 years) vs SFSLX (28 years). SFSLX (2.20) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. SFSLX (9.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFSLX: FSPCX (0) vs SFSLX (1000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.33 vs. SFSLX (-17.36). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.20 vs. SFSLX (-31.35).
| FSPCX | SFSLX | FSPCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.20 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.20 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.579 | -6.435 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 575M | 91.7M | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.33 | -17.36 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | -2.63 | -909% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.20 | -31.35 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.98 | 16.19 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement