Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPGX vs GFACX
FSPGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSPGX vs GFACX
FSPGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPGX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPGX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FSPGX (47.2B). FSPGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSPGX (0.32) vs GFACX (0.00). FSPGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSPGX (10 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSPGX (9.00). FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSPGX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. GFACX (3.47). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 79.26 vs. GFACX (6.33).
| FSPGX | GFACX | FSPGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.35 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.35 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.132 | 6.389 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.2B | 361B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.31 | 3.47 | 384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.16 | 36.04 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.26 | 6.33 | 1,253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 403.20 | 89.42 | 451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement