Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPGX vs RGACX
FSPGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FSPGX vs RGACX
FSPGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FSPGX (47.2B). FSPGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FSPGX (0.32) vs RGACX (0.00). FSPGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FSPGX (10 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSPGX (9.00). FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FSPGX (0) vs RGACX (250). FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.28 vs. RGACX (8.33). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.05 vs. RGACX (15.42).
| FSPGX | RGACX | FSPGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.869 | 5.061 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.2B | 338B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.28 | 8.33 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.19 | 43.76 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.05 | 15.42 | 617% |
| Returns for 10 years | 402.15 | 96.37 | 417% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement