Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPGX vs RGEBX
FSPGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSPGX vs RGEBX
FSPGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPGX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FSPGX (42.3B). FSPGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FSPGX (0.39) vs RGEBX (0.00). FSPGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FSPGX (10 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSPGX (9.00). FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FSPGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. RGEBX (4.75). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 80.73 vs. RGEBX (13.41).
| FSPGX | RGEBX | FSPGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.667 | 9.796 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 357B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 4.75 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.10 | 42.43 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.73 | 13.41 | 602% |
| Returns for 10 years | 390.25 | 94.82 | 412% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers