Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPGX vs RGEBX
FSPGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSPGX vs RGEBX
FSPGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FSPGX (43.7B). FSPGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FSPGX (0.37) vs RGEBX (0.00). FSPGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FSPGX (10 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSPGX (9.00). FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FSPGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. RGEBX (3.57). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 69.05 vs. RGEBX (9.76).
| FSPGX | RGEBX | FSPGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.748 | 9.979 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7B | 342B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 3.57 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.29 | 40.56 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.05 | 9.76 | 707% |
| Returns for 10 years | 379.47 | 95.74 | 396% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement