Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. GGHCX (1.29B). FSPHX (0.00) and GGHCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (36 years). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.16 vs. FSPHX (-7.11). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.27 vs. GGHCX (-9.48).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | 8.204 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 1.29B | 548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | -1.16 | 614% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | 12.32 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | -9.48 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.95 | -15.29 | -144% |