Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. GGHCX (1.16B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (36 years). GGHCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.23 vs. FSPHX (-13.29). GGHCX (-15.14) and FSPHX (-15.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.064 | 1.889 | -268% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 1.16B | 509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.29 | -11.23 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.88 | 5.92 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.91 | -15.14 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.24 | -27.51 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement