Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. GGHCX (1.13B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (36 years). GGHCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.77 vs. FSPHX (-17.51). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.60 vs. GGHCX (-9.33).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.06 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.06 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.807 | -4.652 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 1.13B | 570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.51 | -12.77 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.12 | -11.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | -9.33 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.99 | -29.41 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...