Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. GGHCX (1.22B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (36 years). GGHCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.68 vs. FSPHX (-10.28). GGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -13.20 vs. FSPHX (-15.42).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.229 | 9.727 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 1.22B | 490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.28 | -4.68 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 21.78 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.42 | -13.20 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.98 | -7.81 | -461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement