Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.78B vs. GGHCX (1.24B). FSPHX (0.00) and GGHCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (35 years). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. FSPHX (-3.06). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.82 vs. GGHCX (-14.22).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.835 | 3.073 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.78B | 1.24B | 547% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.06 | -0.03 | 11,182% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.51 | 3.01 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.82 | -14.22 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.91 | -16.63 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...