Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. GGHCX (1.23B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GGHCX (37 years). GGHCX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GGHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. FSPHX (8.99). FSPHX (-17.47) and GGHCX (-17.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.854 | 3.356 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 1.23B | 519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 11.22 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | 12.69 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -17.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.49 | 10.82 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers