Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. GGHCX (1.16B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.45) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GGHCX (37 years). GGHCX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GGHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.49 vs. FSPHX (-1.10). GGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -18.42 vs. FSPHX (-23.61).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.879 | -2.607 | 456% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 1.16B | 498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 4.49 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | 6.79 | -171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.61 | -18.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.45 | 12.00 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement