Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHSX
FSPHX vs GGHSX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GGHSX
FSPHX vs GGHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GGHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. GGHSX (1.16B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHSX: FSPHX (0.45) vs GGHSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GGHSX (9 years). GGHSX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GGHSX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHSX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHSX (1000000). GGHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. FSPHX (1.68). GGHSX return over 5 years is better than : -16.91 vs. FSPHX (-23.74).
| FSPHX | GGHSX | FSPHX / GGHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.72 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.72 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.542 | -1.634 | 645% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 1.16B | 501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 6.97 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.89 | 9.17 | -108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.74 | -16.91 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement