Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. GTHCX (1.19B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (26 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.31 vs. GTHCX (-12.35). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.47 vs. GTHCX (-33.06).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.229 | 1.169 | -618% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 1.19B | 522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.31 | -12.35 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | 5.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.47 | -33.06 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.19 | -52.38 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...