Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. GTHCX (1.25B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (26 years). GTHCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). GTHCX (-10.26) and FSPHX (-10.44) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 0.41 vs. GTHCX (-28.95).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.81 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.81 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.844 | 4.851 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.74B | 1.25B | 541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.44 | -10.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.61 | 1.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.41 | -28.95 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | -48.96 | -35% |