Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. GTHCX (1.2B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX (-14.01) and GTHCX (-14.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.62 vs. GTHCX (-33.06).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.028 | 6.254 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 1.2B | 489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.01 | -14.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.06 | 8.54 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.62 | -33.06 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.41 | -49.18 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement