Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. GTHCX (1.27B). FSPHX (0.00) and GTHCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (26 years). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). GTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.03 vs. FSPHX (-8.97). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -5.20 vs. GTHCX (-33.77).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.606 | 6.487 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 1.27B | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | -8.03 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.51 | 2.94 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.20 | -33.77 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.51 | -48.03 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...