Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GTHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. GTHCX (1.17B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (26 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.45 vs. GTHCX (-16.90). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.04 vs. GTHCX (-37.10).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.110 | 2.572 | -160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 1.17B | 491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.45 | -16.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.07 | -2.61 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.04 | -37.10 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.56 | -53.27 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers