Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GTHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. GTHCX (1.21B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.42) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GTHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. GTHCX (3.04). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -18.25 vs. GTHCX (-41.72).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.753 | 1.438 | -261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 1.21B | 522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 3.04 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.29 | -1.95 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.25 | -41.72 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.42 | -34.44 | -100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement