Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. GTHCX (1.23B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GTHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. GTHCX (2.34). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.61 vs. GTHCX (-39.99).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 3.107 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 1.23B | 517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.90 | 2.34 | 380% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.14 | 0.34 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.61 | -39.99 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.94 | -31.00 | -135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers