Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. GTHCX (1.16B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.45) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GTHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.60 vs. GTHCX (-3.16). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -24.04 vs. GTHCX (-41.40).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.879 | -2.934 | 405% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 1.16B | 498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | -3.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.75 | -6.54 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.04 | -41.40 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.88 | -32.36 | -99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers