Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GTHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. GTHCX (1.27B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.42) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GTHCX (28 years). GTHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GTHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. GTHCX (5.03). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.56 vs. GTHCX (-38.89).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.675 | 8.113 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 1.27B | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.59 | 5.03 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.34 | 6.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.56 | -38.89 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.08 | -29.73 | -155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement