Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GTHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. GTHCX (1.21B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GTHCX (28 years). GTHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. GTHCX (59.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GTHCX (-1.91). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. GTHCX (-41.80).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.82 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 3.337 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 1.21B | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | -1.91 | -333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 0.56 | 880% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -41.80 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | -29.84 | -154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement