Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HBGHX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HBGHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. HBGHX (118M). HBGHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HBGHX (0.24) vs FSPHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HBGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HBGHX (25 years). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. HBGHX (28.00). FSPHX (0) and HBGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.64 vs. FSPHX (-9.25). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.53 vs. HBGHX (-27.81).
| FSPHX | HBGHX | FSPHX / HBGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.028 | 2.997 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 118M | 5,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | -2.64 | 351% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.53 | -22.61 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.53 | -27.81 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | -51.28 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers