Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HBGHX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HBGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. HBGHX (103M). HBGHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HBGHX (0.57) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HBGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HBGHX (25 years). HBGHX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). HBGHX (42.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX (0) and HBGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.25 vs. HBGHX (-18.80). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.73 vs. HBGHX (-32.08).
| FSPHX | HBGHX | FSPHX / HBGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -8.329 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 103M | 5,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.57 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.25 | -18.80 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 4.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.73 | -32.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.69 | -47.12 | -76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement