Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HBGHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HBGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. HBGHX (107M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HBGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HBGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HBGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HBGHX (25 years). HBGHX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. HBGHX (42.00). FSPHX (0) and HBGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.79 vs. FSPHX (-10.80). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.01 vs. HBGHX (-37.26).
| FSPHX | HBGHX | FSPHX / HBGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.083 | -5.087 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 107M | 5,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.80 | -7.79 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.54 | -28.16 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.01 | -37.26 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.24 | -55.95 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...