Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HBGHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HBGHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. HBGHX (104M). HBGHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HBGHX (0.49) vs FSPHX (0.45). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HBGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HBGHX (26 years). HBGHX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HBGHX (50.00). FSPHX (0) and HBGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -23.32 vs. HBGHX (-32.77).
| FSPHX | HBGHX | FSPHX / HBGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -3.413 | 423% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 104M | 5,560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 11.83 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | 6.83 | -208% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | -32.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | -43.33 | -57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement