Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HBGHX
FSPHX vs HBGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HBGHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HBGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. HBGHX (112M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HBGHX: FSPHX (0.39) vs HBGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HBGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HBGHX (26 years). HBGHX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HBGHX (50.00). FSPHX (0) and HBGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. FSPHX (6.37). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. HBGHX (-26.63).
| FSPHX | HBGHX | FSPHX / HBGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 1.417 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 112M | 6,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 18.33 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 14.78 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -26.63 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | -24.54 | -188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers