Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. HGHAX (751M). HGHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHAX (0.20) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHAX (25 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHAX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.25 vs. HGHAX (-18.05). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.73 vs. HGHAX (-16.87).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -2.557 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 751M | 783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.20 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.25 | -18.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 6.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.73 | -16.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.69 | -4.45 | -802% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement