Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HGHAX (806M). HGHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHAX (0.20) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHAX (25 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHAX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.63 vs. HGHAX (-15.07). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.17 vs. HGHAX (-11.36).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.165 | -4.109 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 806M | 727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.20 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.63 | -15.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 6.65 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.17 | -11.36 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.56 | -18.29 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement