Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. HGHAX (826M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: FSPHX (0.42) vs HGHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHAX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.84 vs. FSPHX (14.20). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.87 vs. FSPHX (-11.47).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.554 | 12.777 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 826M | 763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 30.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.89 | 24.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.47 | -3.87 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.14 | 31.73 | 161% |