Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and HGHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. HGHAX (772M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: FSPHX (0.42) vs HGHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHAX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.53 vs. FSPHX (7.89). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.97 vs. FSPHX (-18.25).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.753 | 4.894 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 772M | 816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 27.53 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.29 | 14.58 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.25 | -8.97 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.42 | 17.58 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement