Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. HGHAX (791M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: FSPHX (0.39) vs HGHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHAX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.99 vs. FSPHX (10.35). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.58 vs. FSPHX (-14.00).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.810 | 7.754 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 791M | 853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | 22.99 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.03 | 20.92 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.00 | -7.58 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.34 | 24.48 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers