Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. HGHAX (731M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: FSPHX (0.45) vs HGHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHAX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. FSPHX (0.76). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -12.69 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.527 | -1.700 | 678% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 731M | 791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 18.07 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.88 | 7.16 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.99 | -12.69 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.35 | 20.92 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement