Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. HGHCX (787M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHCX (26 years). HGHCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHCX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). HGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.78 vs. FSPHX (10.22). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.87 vs. HGHCX (-17.63).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 6.046 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 787M | 809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 21.78 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.21 | 8.91 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | -17.63 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.70 | -6.51 | -641% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement