Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. HGHCX (796M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHCX (26 years). HGHCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHCX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). HGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. FSPHX (6.37). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. HGHCX (-19.04).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 6.675 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 796M | 848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 17.57 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 11.31 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -19.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | -2.93 | -1,574% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement