Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. HGHCX (723M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.45) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHCX (26 years). HGHCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHCX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). HGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). HGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -21.25 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -3.808 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 723M | 800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 11.72 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | -0.69 | 2,059% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | -21.25 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | -13.18 | -188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement