Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. HGHFX (834M). HGHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHFX (0.50) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHFX (9 years). HGHFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHFX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). HGHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. FSPHX (0.02). HGHFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.37 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 12.455 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 834M | 745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 5.25 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 13.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | -7.37 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement