Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. HGHFX (732M). HGHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHFX (0.58) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHFX (8 years). HGHFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHFX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.02 vs. HGHFX (-17.78). FSPHX (-19.49) and HGHFX (-19.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.670 | -8.424 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 732M | 783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.02 | -17.78 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.77 | -9.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.49 | -19.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement