Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HGHFX (801M). HGHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHFX (0.57) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHFX (8 years). HGHFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHFX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. HGHFX (-16.09). HGHFX (-13.52) and FSPHX (-13.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -5.720 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 801M | 732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.57 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -16.09 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | -3.21 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -13.52 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement