Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. HGHFX (829M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHFX: FSPHX (0.42) vs HGHFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHFX (9 years). HGHFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHFX (49.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). HGHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.98 vs. FSPHX (14.59). HGHFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.57 vs. FSPHX (-10.56).
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.675 | 13.443 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 829M | 760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.59 | 32.98 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.34 | 27.82 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.56 | 0.57 | -1,848% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement