Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNAX
FSPHX vs JFNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs JFNAX
FSPHX vs JFNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. JFNAX (6.03B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNAX: FSPHX (0.39) vs JFNAX (0.29). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs JFNAX (17 years). JFNAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. JFNAX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNAX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNAX (2500). JFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.92 vs. FSPHX (6.37). JFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.95 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FSPHX | JFNAX | FSPHX / JFNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 8.671 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 6.03B | 112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.29 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 24.92 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 27.34 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | 16.95 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 80.91 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement