Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. JFNCX (4.49B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs JFNCX (16 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNCX (35.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). FSPHX (-16.27) and JFNCX (-16.52) have marching annual gain over last year. JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.61 vs. FSPHX (-15.70).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.459 | 0.893 | -275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 4.49B | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.27 | -16.52 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.51 | 6.84 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.70 | -4.61 | 341% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.41 | 0.26 | 6,676% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers