Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. JFNCX (5.28B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.45) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs JFNCX (17 years). JFNCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.09 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -3.955 | 365% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 5.28B | 110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 18.41 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | 8.43 | -168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | 4.09 | -570% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | 42.81 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement