Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. JFNCX (6.03B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs JFNCX (17 years). JFNCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.17 vs. FSPHX (6.37). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.34 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 8.134 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 6.03B | 112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 23.17 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 21.95 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | 9.34 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 59.11 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement