Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. LHCAX (8.19M). FSPHX (0.00) and LHCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. FSPHX (-7.11). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.63 vs. FSPHX (-3.27).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | 4.958 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 8.19M | 86,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | 5.82 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | 19.00 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | 19.63 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers