Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCAX (7.21M). LHCAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCAX (0.33) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX (3.53) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.53 vs. FSPHX (-10.80). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. FSPHX (-10.01).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.03 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.53 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.083 | -7.985 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 7.21M | 88,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.33 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.80 | -3.53 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.54 | 1.27 | -592% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.01 | 8.61 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...