Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. LHCAX (7.15M). LHCAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCAX (0.33) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.37 vs. FSPHX (-14.20). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.46 vs. FSPHX (-14.75).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.174 | -8.455 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 7.15M | 86,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.33 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.20 | -8.37 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.27 | 6.81 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.75 | 2.46 | -600% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement