Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LHCAX (8.06M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCAX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LHCAX (0.15). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCAX (7 years). LHCAX (3.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. FSPHX (0.60). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.89 vs. FSPHX (-23.23).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.48 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.527 | -3.465 | 333% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 8.06M | 71,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.15 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 21.10 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.66 | 18.48 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.23 | 7.89 | -294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement