Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. LHCAX (8.74M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCAX: FSPHX (0.41) vs LHCAX (0.14). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCAX (7 years). LHCAX (3.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.64 vs. FSPHX (10.22). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.51 vs. FSPHX (-14.87).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.48 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 5.242 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 8.74M | 72,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.14 | 291% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 29.64 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.21 | 30.74 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | 15.51 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement