Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. LHCCX (7.33M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.74 vs. FSPHX (-12.08). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.87 vs. FSPHX (-10.63).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.78 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.09 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.642 | -5.272 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 7.33M | 79,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.08 | -6.74 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.39 | 17.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.63 | 4.87 | -218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement