Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. LHCCX (8.12M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.72 vs. FSPHX (-10.28). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.77 vs. FSPHX (-15.42).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.78 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.09 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.229 | 6.685 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 8.12M | 73,448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.28 | 2.72 | -378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 24.40 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.42 | -3.77 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement