Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. LHCCX (7.22M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.04 vs. FSPHX (-15.54). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.66 vs. FSPHX (-17.40).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.78 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.09 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.936 | -5.543 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 7.22M | 79,399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.54 | -8.04 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.33 | 3.45 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.40 | -3.66 | 476% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement