Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCCX (6.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.28) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.62 vs. FSPHX (-17.51). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.02 vs. FSPHX (-3.60).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.78 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 4.28 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.807 | -13.859 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.8M | 94,394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.51 | -13.62 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.12 | -14.37 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | 6.02 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...