Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. LHCCX (8.85M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.42) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCCX (7 years). LHCCX (4.23) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.92 vs. FSPHX (9.73). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.59 vs. FSPHX (-13.34).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.78 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 4.23 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.418 | 6.983 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 8.85M | 71,175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.73 | 25.92 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.24 | 38.18 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.34 | 10.59 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement